Canada’s Abuse of Immigrants

By: Tia DeRuiter

In July of 2020, the Federal Court of Canada passed a ruling that withdrew Canada
from their participation within the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) (Canadian Council
for Refugees [CCR], 2020). An agreement which legalized the transfer of refugees back to
whatever “safe” country they landed in first, either Canada or the United States (Government
of Canada). The proposed withdrawal from this agreement was brought forth on the grounds
of the egregious conditions in which the United States treated those who were sent back from
Canada, including arbitrary imprisonment, psychological abuse, and extreme human rights
abuses (CCR, 2020). The court justified their decision to leave the STCA because of the
United States clear and appalling violations of section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms (CCR, 2020). The section in which gives all persons the equal right to security
and liberty, a right infringed upon by the erroneous treatment of refugees in the U.S. (CCR,
2020).

Almost one year later, in June of 2021, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty
International (AI) released a report detailing the appalling treatment of immigrants in Canada,
those in which are remarkably similar to the conditions for which Canada left the STCA
(Gros et al., 2021). According to this report, Canada imprisons thousands of people a year on
immigration related charges, often involving abusive behaviour (Gros et al., 2021). Not only
are the reasons for which these immigrants are detained not disclosed or arbitrary, but their
release dates are kept from them as well (Gros et al., 2021). During their imprisonment,
immigrant detainees face some of the most putative measures, including being housed in
maximum security prisons, and emplaced into solitary confinement, finding that these
conditions were even harsher for Black immigrants, and those with psychosocial disabilities
(Gros et al., 2021). These abuses have had devastatingly severe impacts on the mental health
of these immigrants, often resulting in feelings of hopelessness, failure, and sometimes
suicide (Gros et al., 2021).

It is not difficult to draw the parallels between this abuse, arbitrary detainment, and
human rights violations, that not less than a year ago Canada’s courts denounced the United
States for (CCR, 2020). Both HRW and AI hold that something must be done to eradicate
these atrocious conditions and treatment (Gros et al., 2021). A report done in 2016, in
conjunction with the University of Toronto, AI, and many other organizations, provided
suggestions for eliminating these abuses (Muscati, 2016). Including, but not limited to,
establishing an independent body to which the Canadian Border Patrol Service Agency
(CBSA) is held accountable, modifying existing laws and regulations, imposing requirements
to access of essential services for both physical and mental health, and increasing funding to
find safe, healthy, and adequate housing for immigration detainees (Muscati, 2016). Since
this, both the CBSA and the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada have responded,
declaring their intentions to look further into this issue, but action has yet to be seen
(Ossowski, 2021; Wex, 2021). While Canada may never change their approach to this issue,
there is hope through advocacy by AI, HRW, and institutions like UofT, that there will be
amendments in the future.

Image Attribution: hrw.org, via Getty Images

The Detention of the Two Michaels: A Story on China’s Human Rights Abuses

By: Peter Xavier Rossetti

Michael Korvig and Michael Spavor, known as the “two Michaels,” returned to Canada after spending over 1000 days detained in China. Their collective story is a harrowing example of China’s human rights violations and willingness to use people as a means for geopolitical gain. Now that they are home and present in the minds of Canadians and others, it is essential to report their treatment while in China accurately. Background information is necessary to understand the severity of the tribulation the two Michaels faced.

In early December of 2018, a woman named Meng Wanzhou was about to make a layover stop in Canada while flying to Mexico (Corera, 2020). Nothing, in particular, made this stopover in Vancouver strange, but Wanzhou was no ordinary tourist. Wanzhou is the chief financial officer of Huawei, and the United States wanted her on charges of bank and wire fraud that helped her company circumnavigate the US sanction on Iran (Karphal, 2020). As soon as she landed in Vancouver, Canadian officials arrested her and prepared her extradition case to the States. Several days later, Michael Spavor and Michael Korvig were detained in China.

Korvig, a former diplomat, and Spavor, a businessman, were convicted of vague espionage and spying charges, with the latter being sentenced to 11 years in prison by Chinese courts (Aziz, 2021). Many people speculated that the arrests were an act of retaliation by the Chinese government after the arrest of Wanzhou in Canada. Despite Canadian and American attempts to persuade China into dropping the charges, the two men would go on to spend nearly three years of their lives detained. The conditions of their detention were brutal, and they highlight the gross and arbitrary imprisonment tactics employed by the Chinese government.

Korvig and Spavor spent most of their imprisonment completely cut-off from the outside world. Chinese officials allowed the two men to make only a handful of phone calls throughout their captivity while also barring Canadian diplomats from reaching them (Coletta, 2021). To put into perspective how isolated they were, Korvig and Spavor appeared to be missing common knowledge about current international events. For example, after a long-overdue meeting with a consular in October of 2020, Korvig was finally informed that the pandemic had spread across the world, resulting in the death of millions (Hopper, 2021). Deprived of basic information pertaining to current events, Korvig and Spavor spent their days detached and unaware of what was happening in the outside world.

Isolation was not the only thing the two Michaels had to cope with during their detainment, as the actual physical conditions of the prison cells were inhumane. Reports determined that both men were forced to live in tiny cells filled with other prisoners and were denied the ability to leave (Hopper, 2021). Unlike Western prisons, these detainment centres contain no communal spaces such as exercise yards or dining halls. Besides the confined, brutal living conditions, the two Micheals were also subject to psychological torment. The bright lighting of the cell was kept on during all hours of the day, allowing for little rest, and the two were treated to daily integrations by Chinese authorities (Nossal, 2021). The Chinese government’s mental and emotional abuses inflicted on Korvig and Spavor are unspeakable.

The arbitrary conditions that the Korvig and Spavor were subject to are gross inflictions on human rights. It has been a massive relief to have both men return home. However, it is important to acknowledge that these isolation conditions, physical confinement, and psychological abuse are not unique to the two Michaels. China has been detaining people in this brutal fashion long before the Korvig and Spavor were sentenced to prison there. The Chinese government will continue to act in such a manner until they face a firm international stance. No human being should be subject to such treatment.

References:

Aziz, Saba. “ ‘Free at last’: Canadian Michael Korvig, wife speak about emotional return from China.” Global News, 26 Sep. 2021,

https://globalnews.ca/news/8221895/west-block-michael-kovrig/

Coletta, Amanda. “Canada’s ‘two Michaels’ back home after more than 1,000 days imprisoned in China as Huawei’s Meng cuts deal with U.S.” The Washington Post, 25 Sep. 2021, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/09/24/canada-two-michaels-china-huawei/

Corera, Gordon. “Meng Wanzhou: Questions over Huawei executive’s arrest as legal battle continues.” BBC, 31 Oct. 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54756044

Hopper, Tristin. “No sunlight, a hole for a toilet: What two years in Chinese detention has been like for the two Michaels.” National Post, 19 Mar. 2021, https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/no-sunlight-a-hole-for-a-toilet-what-two-years-in-c hinese-detention-has-been-like-for-the-two-michaels

Karphal, Arjun. “The extradition trial of Huawei’s CFO starts this month – here’s what to watch.” CNBC, 9 Jan. 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/10/huawei-cfo-meng-wanzhou-extradition-trial-explained. html

Nossal, Kim Richard. “Wrong place, wrong citizenship: The tribulations of the Two Michaels.” The Interpreter, 19 Jan. 2021, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/wrong-place-wrong-citizenship-tribulations-t wo-michaels

Image Attribution: Michael Korvig and Michael Spavor after landing in Calgary and being greeted by Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau (image from The Globe and Mail)

Theory in Action

By: Serina Woo

There shall be no justification for what the government of Zimbabwe has done to its citizens. Led by republican President Emmerson Mnangagwa, the government has once again failed the people of Zimbabwe. In Mnangagwa’s election speech in 2017, he promised to improve the quality of the government and reach across political ethnic and racial lines to strengthen Zimbabwe’s democracy (Zimbabwe: An Opportunity for Reform?). Filled with hope, Zimbabweans anticipated a political evolution. Yet, after Zimbabwe’s military brought an end to 37 years of rule by former president Robert Mugabe’s authoritarian regime, it’s continual presence as a key political player complicated Mnangagwa’s task of reinstituting effective governance (Zimbabwe’s “Military-assisted Transition” and Prospects for Recovery). On August 7, 2020, Zimbabwean police transferred prominent journalist, Hopewell Chin’ono, and opposition leader, Jacob Ngarivhume, to the infamous Chikurubi Maximum Security Prison (Chigumadzi, 1). Both were arrested and accused of inciting police violence, while in reality, the government played a prominent role in unreasonably enforcing violence amongst the protesters (Chigumadzi, 1). The treatment they received was terrible, being put in leg iron casts, and denied of bail, private visits with lawyers and family, food and adequate covid-19 precautions (Chigumadzi, 1). However, this is only one of the many issues that encapsulate the political persecution and public repression of Zimbabwe’s military state, marking the beginning of social unrest among Zimbabweans. In response to the thousands of protesters who marched on the streets, the government ordered a vicious attack – deploying soldiers as well as police force (Piguo, 1). To say the least, groups of protestors have also engaged in intimidation, vandalism, and looting. Though some of it was undeniably orchestrated, most appeared to be spontaneous (Chigumadzi, 1). By referencing the political ideology of the philosopher and economist, John Stuart Mill, it justifies the protests and serves as a framework for the defective government’s reconstruction. On the contrary, philosopher Edmond Burke’s political ideology fails to draw on the issue at hand, undermining the significance of innovation within a political context and favouring President Mnangagwa’s absurd policies and decisions.

John Stuart Mill was a liberal during the nineteenth-century, and in the modernized society, his ideology and written work continue to resonate with politicians. He is often brought up during discussions of social justice and income inequality, and his theories criticized privilege, oppression, and injustice. Mill’s theory of three liberties: the absolute freedom of opinion of sentiment, liberty to pursue one’s own tastes and pursuits, and liberty of combination among individuals, justify the protester’s motives of protesting. In his first liberty, he understood that silencing the expression of an opinion as peculiarly evil, “robbing the human race.” His theory supports the protesters’ purpose for attacking the government’s decision to subjugate opposing voices through violence. Further, this theory also validates the protesters’ resentment towards the government’s resolution to block internet services, suspending the flow of information and bringing about the prevalent confusion (Piguo, 3). Hence, giving the protesters justified reasons to protest for their concerns about the absence of freedom. Nonetheless, in Mill’s second liberty, he truly believed in “the liberty to pursue one’s own taste and pursuits,” where people should be allowed to live their lives exactly how they see fit, as long as this does not harm others in their society. Though modern-day politicians might refute Mill’s theory for it offers society a disproportionate amount of independence and freedom, but his individualistic values support the citizens’ protests for their futuristic expectations. However, only if we exclude the casualties from the physical encounters between the police force and protesters that created disunity within Zimbabwe. Mill’s liberal individualistic conception is also seen in his third liberty which underlines an individual’s freedom of choice to form groups of human rights activists, as long as this does not harm others in their society. If individuals of Zimbabwe wish to form an opposing stance to the government in the hope of advocating the respect for fundamental human rights, they should be entitled to do so. These ideas from Mill’s political philosophy strengthen the motives of protest and directly contradict Zimbabwe’s traditionalism, and unless convictions turn against this mindset, the demand for continuing traditions will only increase.

In addition, Mill valued individualism, his theory could be used to remodel and embellish the dictatorial government as a whole. Mill’s Harm Principle embodies the notion that “the sole end for which mankind is warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” This could prompt the government to limit its unreasonable use of assault towards opposing groups and politicians as it is unreasonable to exercise power over protesters, except a minority of protesters who participated in lootings. Though the government’s order of violence on its citizens could be appropriated as an act of “self-protection” for state owned properties and police officers, it is evident that the government has a distorted idea of restricting opposing voices to retain its power. Accordingly, the government should reevaluate its attitude towards individual rights and achieving social utility based on Mill’s values, striking a balance between individual autonomy and government interference to limit freedoms in the interest of preventing harm to others. Individual protesters should have the freedom to defend their rights subsequent to the unlawful arrests and restraint of freedom made by the police and military, rejecting the government’s long term abuse of power. In order to achieve a balance, the government should cease its human rights violations, such as the invasion of privacy, obstruction of movement and limitation of access to information by peacefully reaching a consensus with the protesters and acknowledging their stance. Effectively, the government should utilize Mill’s Harm Principle to amend its structure, and manage opposing groups democratically.

On the other end of the political spectrum, the philosophy of Edmond Burke, the founder of conservatism would support the Zimbabwean government in defending contemporary arrangements against both idealistic desires and innovative schemes of reform though it is shown to be over-optimistic and out of date. Given that Burke’s ideology outlines the tradition and custom of the social contract, he does not consider innovative reforms suggested by citizens as necessary to the success of a country. He regards innovation as the result of a selfish temper and confined views, reinforcing the government’s desire to deny democratic changes from an authoritarian state. This theory also highlights the characteristics of conservatism seen in our contemporary society. Along with the rejection of innovation shown by the Zimbabwean government, Burke’s theory rejects the idea of changes in the government because he believed, “the entire progression of the commonwealth would be demolished.” Despite that, the government of Zimbabwe failed to take into account that the dismissal of these proposed changes violates democratic principles in our modern society, which are different from Burke’s conservative theory. The government’s disbelief in new changes to prevent the loss of power, similar to Burke’s theory, led to Zimbabwe’s failure in achieving democracy. Burke implied that the present generation does not have the right to ask for a change in politics because it would risk the country becoming a disaster: “It [is not] among [this generation’s] rights to cut off the entail or commit waste on the inheritance by destroying at their pleasure the whole original fabric of their society, hazarding to leave to those who came after them a ruin instead of a habitation.” This further empowers the Zimbabwean government in casually making decisions to benefit itself, and continues to justify public repression and freedom violations. Despite he urged people to understand the significance in teaching these successors as little to respect their contrivances as they had themselves respected the institutions of their forefathers, the consequences of his conservative thinking contradicts his belief.

Contrary to Mill’s theories, Burke’s perception of a government body implies the idea that citizens cannot depose an oppressive government due to the risk of a disaster. Despite that, the Zimbabwean government’s introduction of fiscal and economic reforms led to the hyperinflation of goods and services (Piguo, 10). As well, the values of ordinary citizens’ income and savings have been cut by more than half, further impoverishing an already struggling population (Piguo, 10). This counters Burke’s theory, indicating that an oppressive government is the cause of disaster, not the opposing opinions of citizens. Further, Burke believed that social achievements should be built up over time and suggested governments to find a compromise between what everyone wants and what’s beneficial to society from a historic point of view. However, as society develops, fixating on historic views in modern-day democracy brings on contradiction. After the ousting of Zimbabwe’s former authoritarian government, it marked a change, defying historical political values, and submitting to presentist democratic values. Yet the government’s response to violence towards the protests shows the embedded military influence in decision making, reflecting the fear of losing power. Similar to the government’s worries, Burke believes a change in government operation might trigger the fall of a government. He believed that the experience and obstacles a government had endured in its past should be recognized and preserved, hence rejecting the disposition of a government. Further, there was not an adequate structure that he approved of to act as a guide for changes during his time. Lastly, he viewed the state of government as a living organism, underlining the complexity of a society. Therefore, no one should be able to redirect the power as it might lead to a disaster. Although he recognized that a change in the law is necessary, he thought reforms should be made from a historical perspective. However, this would lower the efficiency of his reform in the ever changing society. Similar to the situation of Zimbabwe, laws aren’t likely to change as it is proven over time that the current system gives the government power over the citizens. Hence, it is seen in both Burke’s theory and the Zimbabwean government’s actions that they both value having power more than beneficial and efficient changes to the community.

Zimbabwe is in desperate need of reform if the government’s aim is to maintain stability and transition into a democratic country. John Stuart Mill’s liberal theories embody both sociality and freedom, guaranteeing freedom to individuals from different ideological groups. His theories underline Zimbabweans’ right to fulfill their interests through the uninterrupted expression of opinions. Supporting Zimbabweans’ humanitarian concerns and holding the faulty government accountable, the Zimbabwean government should take into account Mill’s theories and carry out changes to become a democratic state. On the contrary, Burke’s theories challenge the effectiveness of innovation based upon his old-fashioned thinking and support the Zimbabwean government to a certain extent where both Burke and the government value power over change. His theories are relatively controversial considering many aspects support the authoritarian government’s decisions. Critics believe that the Zimbabwean government is likely to be able to “put a lid” on the unrest and take activists off the streets, emphasizing the need for a reform of the government (Piguo, 22). As time goes by, though both philosopher’s ideologies were beneficial to future generations, being part of the foundation of the establishment of parties and the role of the member of Parliament, we should not be restricted by the views of historical philosophers as their ideas might not be up to date. Politicians should incorporate citizen’s current needs and desires, taking into consideration its effects on the future while making political decisions to form a harmonious society. 

Works Cited

JS Mill, On Liberty, 1859.

Mutsaka | AP, Farai. “Scores of Zimbabwe Protesters Arrested, Military in Streets.” Washington

Post, WP Company, 31 July 2020, www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/empty-streets-in-zimbabwe-as-security-forces-thwart-protest/2020/07/31/cda13416-d309-11ea-826b-cc394d824e35_story.html.

“Opinion | In Zimbabwe, Two Political Prisoners Are a Symbol of a Repressive State.” Chigumadzi, Panashe. 

The Washington Post, WP Company, 17 Aug. 2020, www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/08/18/zimbabwe-two-political-prisoners-are-symbol-repressive-state/.

Piguo, Piers. “Revolt and Repression in Zimbabwe.” Crisis Group, 31 Jan. 2019,

www.crisisgroup.org/africa/southern-africa/zimbabwe/revolt-and-repression-zimbabwe.

“Zimbabwe’s ‘Military-Assisted Transition’ and Prospects for Recovery.” Crisis Group, 20 Dec. 2017,

www.crisisgroup.org/africa/southern-africa/zimbabwe/b134-zimbabwes-military-assisted-transition-and-prospects-recovery.

Crisis in Myanmar

By: Penelope Giesen

Myanmar Continues its fight against oppression

Background
On February 1, 2021, there was a military coup in Myanmar, which a country in southeastern Asia, bordering India, China, Thailand, and Laos. This coup halted the nation’s first quasi-democracy that had previously held power since 2015, led by Aung Sung Suki. Aung Sung Suki is widely considered to be a controversial figurehead who successfully transformed Myanmar into a democracy after a long history of military dictatorship, yet whose leadership has been marred by ethnic violence and potential unethical alliances with the military now in power.

Protests
Since the coup, there has been widespread civil disobedience against the oppressive policies put in place by the military government in power, the Tatmadaw. These immediate policies included seizing control of infrastructure, suspending international and national flights, stopping internet access in most major cities, and closing the stock market and major banks. All of these measures were justified under claims of a “constitutional” state of emergency declared by the military. Though these protests started peacefully, they quickly turned violent and sparked ruthless retaliation by the government. On February 20, 2021, two unarmed protesters were killed, including a 16-year-old boy, prompting millions to go on strike two days later. The retaliations have escalated with the military, killing 600 and maiming, injuring, and torturing thousands more on March 27, 2021. This incredible violence inspired an armed resistance by the Burmese people, who call themselves the People’s National Defense, and they engage in jungle gorilla warfare against the Tatmadaw. Despite facing rampant food insecurity and constant threat from the Tatmadaw, the People’s National Defense is determined to fight for liberties and the freedom that had once existed. Yet this army is underfunded, and many have been pushed up into the remote hills where they must combat hunger, poisonous snakes, and dengue along with their families when the Tatmadaw systematically burns villages that are home to these resistance fighters. Despite these challenges, the horrific conditions don’t diminish the determination of the resistance, which has been further galvanized by their shadow government calling for a revolution by armed insurrection on September 7, 2021. Many of the Burmese people have a complicated relationship with the armed resistance in support of their former democratic government given the atrocities inflicted upon ethnic groups in the nation such as the Rohingya Muslims. In a state of disorder and terror, it is hard to distinguish what is being fought for, but some believe that this fight for liberty is a turning point for the Burmese people as it is uniting all Burmese people in a fight for liberation. Thet Swe Win, a Burmese human rights activist, notes the Tatwondow’s terrorization of Burmese people in villages and urban areas has “opened people’s eyes to the rights abuses other ethnic groups have long been facing”. As a result, people have started to broaden their horizons for the liberty they are fighting for.


Humanitarian crisis:
This armed coup and ensuing resistance had caused the death of at least 1180 armed resistors and civilians, the destruction of innumerable villages and homes, and displacement of at least 176,000 people internally with an additional 22,000 to other countries. The Tatmadaw has been documented using tactics against Myanmar’s civilian population such as burning villages, looting properties, torture, and mass arrests. This is in addition to the hundreds of thousands of Burmese refugees such as the Rohingya Muslims that have fled ethnic terror for decades. Many of these refugees flee with their families to India, which is an arduous journey that involves spending days in the woods without food or water and having to cross the Tiau River that separates the nations. And there are growing concerns that neighboring countries such as Thailand will begin to turn away refugees at the border.


What can be done to help?
The humanitarian crisis in Myanmar is multifaceted and severe. Civilians, members of the rebel army, and refugees all are in dire need of support. There are many approaches that could be taken to support these groups, including: donations to various humanitarian aid organizations, advocacy to local representatives and the federal government of increased sanctions, and blockades, and establishing a “no-fly zone” over Myanmar. Some reliable organizations that could be donated to include: The International Rescue Committee (which has been supporting Myanmar since 2008), Save the Children (which supports children in dangerous situations around the world and specifically provides support to children and families in Myanmar that have been affected by the deadly violence occurring). In addition, donations to the Civil Disobedience Movement will provide support to Burmese people participating in protests against their authoritarian government. In addition, support to the Burmese people could include contacting your country’s relevant diplomatic and government representatives to ask for increased sanctions on Myanmar in solidarity with the protestors trying to weaken and destabilize the military in control. Another method of support could involve exerting pressure on our government to support the Secretary General’s special envoy on Myanmar, per Christine Schraner Burgener’s request in her speech to the UN press conference on October 21, 2021. Her request noted that international leadership not accept the Tatmadaw as a legitimate established government as they are responsible for the majority of the instability and violence in the nation.

References:
1) Goldman, Russell. “Myanmar’s Coup and Violence, Explained.” The New York Times, The New
York Times, 1 Feb. 2021,
https://www.nytimes.com/article/myanmar-news-protests-coup.html.
2) Wee, Sui-lee. “Thousands Flee Myanmar for India amid Fears of a Growing Refugee Crisis.”
The New York Times, The New York Times, 19 Oct. 2021,
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/19/world/asia/myanmar-refugees-india.html?search
ResultPosition=2.
3) Martin, Michael F. “Myanmar’s Opposition Wants U.S. Intervention. Here Are Some Options.”
Foreign Policy, 24 May 2021,
https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/24/myanmar-opposition-coup-us-intervention-sanctio
ns-options/.
4) Win, Thet Swe. “The Coup United the People of Myanmar against Oppression.” Opinions | Al
Jazeera, Al Jazeera, 1 Oct. 2021,
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/10/1/the-coup-united-the-people-of-myanmar
-against-oppression.
5) UNHCR Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific (RBAP). “Myanmar Emergency – UNHCR
Regional Update – 1 September 2021.” UNHCR Operational Data Portal (ODP), UNHCR , 1
Sept. 2021,
https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/88481.
6) Snodgrass, Erin. “5 Ways to Help Anti-Coup Protesters on the Ground in Myanmar Right
Now.” Insider, Insider, 11 Apr. 2021,
https://www.insider.com/ways-help-anti-coup-protesters-myanmar-right-now-2021-4.
7)Desk, News. “Myanmar Situation Deteriorating – United Nations Press Conference (21
October 2021).” The Global Herald, The Global Herald , 21 Oct. 2021,
https://theglobalherald.com/news/myanmar-situation-deteriorating-united-nations-press-c
onference-21-october-2021/.
Image Source: New York Times October 26, 2021

The Xinjiang Conflict: a human rights issue worthy of greater international pressure

By: Lucas Khoo

Since 2017, at least 1 million Uyghurs have been arbitrarily interned in Xinjiang, China (PBS, 2019). Forcibly placed into what the Chinese government calls “Vocational Education and Training Centres”, Uyghurs are victims of racial discrimination, mass indoctrination, and as the U.S. recently declared, “genocide” (Axios, 2021). The Uyghur people are a Muslim minority group native to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in Northwest China. The conflict between the Chinese government and the Uyghur people is a longstanding and complex one. Disagreement over who has official claim to the Xinjiang region, separatist sentiment amongst the Uyghur minority, and perpetual belligerence between the Han and Uyghur people has fuelled several conflicts: the 2009 Urumqi Riots which left over 197 people dead, the 2011 Hotan attack, and three other violent attacks in 2014. These types of conflicts have initiated a firm response by the Chinese Communist Party. Xi Jinping’s administration has taken a hard-line approach in addressing the separatist sentiment and terrorism which has been brewing in Xinjiang for many years. It is not wrong to curtail and deter terrorism, however, it is wrong to target an entire ethnic group and subject them to oppressive measures; this is exactly what is unfolding in Xinjiang. Concealing their governmental actions as part of an effort to combat terrorism, the Chinese government has unjustifiably persecuted and deprived thousands of Uyghurs of their human rights. It is difficult to tolerate the fact that approximately 1 million people have been stripped from their families, torn from their religion, and imprisoned because of their ethnicity. That population size alone outnumbers the respective city inhabitants of Washington D.C., San Francisco, and Vancouver. There is no place for arbitrary detention in the 21st century.

While it is important for the international community to maintain good relations with China, the severity of human rights abuses in Xinjiang merits greater international pressure. On March 22nd, 2021, the United States, Canada, Britain, and the European Union imposed sanctions against several Chinese officials (Politico). These sanctions were in direct response to the human rights abuses being committed in Xinjiang. This type of multilateral action against China is crucial; not only does it tangibly penalize the Chinese government, but it symbolizes a western coalition that will not tolerate human rights abuses. Hopefully, in placing pressure on the Chinese government, Chinese leaders will re-evaluate and stop their genocidal operations. The newly appointed U.S. Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, has a great responsibility in the coming years. Being at the helm of U.S. foreign policy, Blinken must steadfastly defend the human rights of Uyghurs and make bold foreign policy decisions; perhaps no other man is in a better position to stand up against the Chinese government. Blinken has affirmed his view that “genocide” is being committed against the Uyghurs (CBS News, 2021). At his confirmation hearing, Blinken asserted that, “forcing men, women, and children into concentration camps, trying to in effect re-educate them to be in adherence to the ideology of the Chinese Communist Party — speaks to an effort to commit genocide” (CBS News, 2021). Blinken’s future actions as secretary of state will be pivotal in the fight for human rights in Xinjiang. Canada has also responded to the ongoing human rights abuses in China. Just recently, Canada’s parliament reproached China for committing genocide in a motion which passed 266 to 0 (BBC, 2021). As with most other humanitarian crises, the Xinjiang Conflict has been met with political disagreement. The Chinese government still refutes any claims of wrongdoing or genocide. Multilateral efforts and verbal condemnation can only go so far, but it is a vital first step toward addressing the atrocities committed by China. Constant and persistent political pressure is needed to protect the human rights of millions of Uyghur people.

The greatly discomforting list of human rights abuses committed against the Uyghur people exceed arbitrary detainment. The Chinese government has been alleged of conducting forced abortions, compulsory sterilization, rape, and torture (Human Rights Watch, 2021). These harrowing crimes against humanity are well documented by reliable sources such as the BBC and Human Rights Watch. The suffering and plight of the Uyghur people may not be visible to most of us in western societies, but thousands of Uyghurs on a daily basis face a cruel reality. One in which they are abused, racialized, and subjugated. One in which fear is rampant and hope is diminished. This genocide can no longer go unnoticed. The United Nations and the rest of the international community must exert their powers to the fullest extent and alleviate the vicious oppression perpetrated by the Chinese government.   

Sources:

Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany. “U.S. Declares China’s Actions against Uighurs ‘Genocide.’” Axios, January 19, 2021. https://www.axios.com/us-declares-china-actions-against-uyghurs-genocide-65e19e86-29ad-4c56-922f-d8a060aa2df8.html.

“‘Break Their Lineage, Break Their Roots.’” Human Rights Watch, Apr 19, 2021. www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/19/break-their-lineage-break-their-roots/chinas-crimes-against-humanity-targeting.

Brennan, Margaret, Christina Ruffini, and Camilla Schick. “With China’s Treatment of Muslim Uighurs Determined to Be Genocide, Biden Administration under Pressure to Act.” CBS News. CBS Interactive. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-treatment-of-muslim-uighurs-determined-to-be-genocide-biden-administration-under-pressure-to-act/.

“Canada’s Parliament Declares China’s Treatment of Uighurs ‘Genocide’.” BBC, February 23, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56163220.

Toosi, Nahal. “U.S., Allies Announce Sanctions on China over Uyghur ‘Genocide’.” POLITICO. POLITICO, March 22, 2021. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/22/us-allies-sanctions-china-uighers-genocide-477434.

Wood, Bryan. “What Is Happening with the Uighurs in China?” PBS. Public Broadcasting Service. Accessed May 6, 2021. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/features/uighurs/.

Women’s Strike Protests in Poland

By Shiva Ivaturi image from uk.reuters.com

Corruption of Political Institutions 

Poland’s nationalist, far-right Law and Justice (PiS) party has been the dominant party in the country since winning the majority of seats in the lower house (235 out of 460 seats) and upper house (61 out of 100 seats) in 2015 parliamentary elections. 

Elections and political parties often face tumultuous cycles. Yet political change does not substantiate action to reduce the power of a country’s basic institutions of justice that are meant to keep all political agendas from crossing irrevocably defined ethical boundaries. After coming into power, the PiS terminated the terms of three constitutional judges belonging to an opposition party and nominated three judges to represent the PiS, a move that ignored the timeframes of their terms of office (Tomczak, 2020). Legal experts across the world deemed the change to the Constitutional Tribunal as an illegal, unwarranted attack on judicial independence that established a link between the most powerful independent court and the ruling party of parliament (BBC, 2016). With a presupposition of corruption overshadowing future rulings made by the Constitutional Tribunal, the rights and freedoms of Polish citizens would be inevitably modified as well (Kobyliński, 2016). 

The party’s propaganda and attempts to delegitimize the human rights of sexual and gender minorities have only continued in recent years, with the Law and Justice party winning the vast majority of local elections in 2018 and maintaining power in the lower house of parliament during 2019 parliamentary elections (Beswick and Abellan-Matamoros, 2019). 

Amendments to the electoral code of Poland in 2018 signed by President Duda changed the framework of the National Electoral Commission (PKW). Previously, all nine members of the commission were appointed by courts, although the reform allowed seven out of the nine members to be chosen by parliament, perpetuating biased influence of the ruling party throughout the electoral process (Freedom House, 2020). 

Observers of the 2019 parliamentary elections from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) concluded that although the elections were generally conducted in a transparent and fair manner, the effect of judicial reforms and state sponsored propaganda through public broadcaster channels reduced the ability of voters to make an informed, impartial choice or to lodge election related complaints without undue influence from government authorities (Freedom House, 2020).

Ruling of the Constitutional Court 

With the Law and Justice (PiS) party having exerted firm control in the past of Poland’s institutions and continuing to do so for the foreseeable future, the quality of life and impact on sexual and gender minorities has become a human rights cataclysm that cannot be ignored for any longer. With the most powerful institutions in the country falling in line to the ruling party, political agendas became commandments that all citizens were subjugated to, irrespective of whether it deprived them of basic human rights they had previously enjoyed. 

Abortion restrictions had previously severely limited the rights of women in Poland, only allowed if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest, if the woman’s life was in danger, or if there were fatal fetal abormalities (Gessen, 2020). However on the 22nd October 2020, the Constitutional Tribunal, tied to the political agenda of the PiS party, held unconstitutional the provision of allowing an abortion should there be fatal fetal abormalities. The tribunal’s justification relied on defining abortion to be permissible only in instances of “absolute necessity”, a vague term seemingly allowing the court to propogate the ideas of the PiS without acknowledging or protecting the rights of pregnant mothers. Notably, the constitutional rights of women were hardly mentioned in the judgement, including but not limited to: guarantee of human dignity, the right to freedom, the right to life, the prohibition of torture and degrading treatment, the right to privacy, the protection of health, and the special protection of mothers before and after birth (Krajewska, 2020). 

Emergence of Women’s Strike Protests 

Following the ruling on 22 October 2020, activists mobilized across the nation to call for a change to the eroding, precarious status of reproductive rights in Poland. The umbrella term for these protests were colloquially referred to as the Women’s Strike, although since its inception the protests have come to encompass a wide variety of human rights issues and call attention to socioeconomic disparities (Gessen, 2020). 

The right to freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of association, freedom of expression, life, liberty, and security of the person to be free from torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatments and/or punishments are provisioned in human rights treaties to which Poland is a party (UN General Assembly, 1966). However, Amnesty International has documented multiple instances of police brutality against peaceful protesters. 

On 9 November 2020, activist Gabriela Lazarek was violently arrested while protesting peacefully in front of the Ministry of Education (Bednarek, 2020). She faces charges of unlawfully influencing by force or threat of the actions of authorities, punishable by up to three years in prison (Code of Criminal Procedure, 1997). Amnesty International holds that these

charges are unjustified. On 10 November, activist Katarzyna Augustynek was arrested in Warsaw while she was protesting peacefully (TVN24, 2020). Video footage shows her talking to three police officers when a fourth officer approaches and demands to see proof of identification, to which she refuses as police do not have a legal basis for conducting an identification check. Katarzyna was forcibly arrested and charged on the basis of a violation of the physical integrity of an officer on duty, punishable by up to three years in prison (Code of Criminal Procedure, 1997). Amnesty International holds that these charges are unjustified. On 11 November, multiple instances of excessive use of force by police on protesters were documented. On 18 November 2020, police kettled protesters and used pepper spray directly in their faces. 

Concerns that the police will continue to resort to excessive use of force and criminalization of peaceful protesters are of the utmost importance during a time where Polish authorities appear to be turning a blind eye to citizens who oppose the deprivation of reproductive rights and social mobility. In fact, Polish authorities appear to be taking punitive actions against the constituents to which they are obligated to represent. 

What Can You Do? 

Broad actions taken to consolidate power in governments is not a new phenomenon. Nor is the deprivation of basic reproductive rights and those of sexual and gender minorities through the corruption of a country’s institutions of justice. In these tumultuous times, we must ask ourselves whether we are willing to stay uninformed and take no action against these sorts of horrific phenomena that continue perpetuating inequalities at every level of society, or whether we will call for change. 

With the onset of a global pandemic, traditional forms of social mobilization have been restricted in order to limit the transmission of COVID-19. Fortunately, activism has increasingly taken advantage of digital channels. Amnesty International at the University of Toronto encourages you to stay informed on the actions of Polish authorities particularly as it relates to the treatment of protestors and contribute to change through letter writing campaigns, petitions, and other forms of communication to raise awareness among peers. Please consider making a financial contribution if you are able to do so to organizations including but not limited to: Amnesty International, Stonewall Poland, and Human Rights Watch!

References

1. “Poland’s Constitutional Court Clashes with New Government.” BBC News, BBC, 9 Mar. 2016, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35766482. 

2. Kobyliński, Konrad. “The Polish Constitutional Court from an Attitudinal and Institutional Perspective Before and After the Constitutional Crisis of 2015–2016.” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016, pp. 94–107., doi:10.1515/wrlae-2018-0006. 

3. Tomczak, Malgorzata. “Poland’s Government Creates Constitutional Crisis It Will Find Hard to Resolve.” Balkan Insight, 30 Nov. 2020, 

balkaninsight.com/2020/11/30/polands-government-creates-constitutional-crisis-it-will-fi nd-hard-to-resolve/. 

4. Kurasinska, Lidia. “This New Political Party in Poland Wants to ‘Re-Christianise’ Europe.” OpenDemocracy, 27 Feb. 2019, 

www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/new-party-poland-aims-re-christianise-europe/. 5. “Poland.” Freedom House, freedomhouse.org/country/poland/freedom-world/2020. 6. Gessen, Masha, et al. “The Abortion Protests in Poland Are Starting to Feel Like a Revolution.” The New Yorker, 17 Nov. 2020, 

www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-abortion-protests-in-poland-are-starting-t o-feel-like-a-revolution. 

7. Beswick, Emma, and Cristina Abellan-Matamoros. “Poland Election: Ruling PiS Win Narrow Majority – Final Results.” Euronews, 15 Oct. 2019, 

www.euronews.com/2019/10/13/poland-head-to-the-polls-with-conservative-ruling-law-j ustice-party-in-the-lead. 

8. UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html 

9. Bednarek, Michalina. “Aktywistka Gabriela Lazarek Spędziła Noc ‘Na Dołku’. Wyszła z Poważnymi Zarzutami.” Wyborcza.pl, 11 Nov. 2020, 

katowice.wyborcza.pl/katowice/7,35063,26502384,aktywistka-gabriela-lazarek-spedzila noc-na-dolku-i-wyszla.html?disableRedirects=true. 

10. The Code of Criminal Procedure of Poland (Act of 6 June 1997). 1997. 11. “Polska Babcia Zatrzymana. Poseł Szczerba: Usłyszała Zarzut Zaatakowania Policjantów Tęczową Torbą.” TVN24, TVN24, 30 Nov. 2020, 

tvn24.pl/polska/polska-babcia-katarzyna-augustynek-zatrzymana-przez-policje-w-sobote w-czasie-protestu–strajk-kobiet-4764431.

No More Stolen Sisters: Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls in Canada

By Mai-Lan Johnston and Aina De Lapparent Álvarez. Image from everythingzoomer.com

Background

While the female Indigenous population represents about 4.3% of the total female population in Canada, indigenous women are disproportionately exposed to violence, and the number of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls is disproportionately high (Pederson). In more detail, there are 115 reported incidents of sexual assault per thousand Indigenous women per year, compared with 35 incidents per thousand non-Indigenous women. 160 in 1000 Indigenous women are victims of violent crime, compared with 74 victims in 1000 of non-Indigenous women (Social Development Canada). Moreover, the aforementioned statistics on missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls are bound to a broader, more systemic problem in Canada. For example, in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, First Nations children living on-reserve experience a poverty rate (62% and 64% respectively) three times higher than non-Indigenous children (15% and 16% respectively) (“Half of First Nations”). These statistics, and many others, support the fact that Indigenous populations are victim to socially biased institutions that often exist to serve the political agendas of the government and neglect the needs of indigenous peoples. Further, reconciliation efforts are often settler-driven rather than driven by indigenous peoples themselves.

In recent years, advocacy organizations such as the Native Women’s Association of Canada and  Canada’s National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls have drawn the far overdue attention of the media and non-Indigenous public to the victimization of Indigenous women in predominantly non-Indigenous communities. However, the new public attention arguably underestimates the reach of this problem; the number of high profile cases that filter through the news cycle do not justly represent the true range of this problem. It is our intention that this article, by explaining a brief history, outlining a handful of the several systemic issues involved, drawing attention to current cases, and providing an update to what is currently being done about the problem, will allow readers to gain a deeper understanding of the victimization of Indigenous women and girls in Canada.

History

In order to gain a deeper understanding of the root causes of the broader social marginalization of Indigenous people, the issue of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls in Canada must be situated in the larger context of Canadian colonial history. More specifically, Indigenous women have been challenged by distinctively troubling problems that can be traced back to the first days of settler-colonialism in Canada. Settler men referred to Indigenous women as “Indian princesses,” stereotyping promiscuity and therefore propagating the sexual vulnerability of these Indigenous women. Colonialism resulted in the death of countless indigenous people, uprooted Indigenous people from their ancestral land and placed them on reserves, took indigenous children from their families and placed them in abusive residential schools, imposed colonial gender roles and norms, and generally sought to eradicate Indigenous culture, values, lifestyles, and peoples. The anger and frustration that came with the eradication of Indigenous culture often materialized as violence against women. The Indian Act was first enforced in 1869 and began the legal discrimination that Indigenous people have suffered since. The legally-binding, wholly unjust Indian Act ultimately posed as justification for perpetual and wide-ranging discrimination against Indigenous people. It intended to enable the Canadian federal government to have absolute control over Indigenous life, to manipulate and to “fix” (read: erase) indigenous culture. In 1985, Bill C-31s was amended to the Indian Act, with the intention of bringing the Indian Act into closer alignment with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in terms of discrimination against women. However, several First Nations women have spoken out about their dissatisfaction with Bill-31s, as land and funds dedicated to Indigenous communities are severely limited (Pederson).  Unfortunately,  recent history is equally as disturbing than the history inflicted by colonialist settlers.

Systemic Background of Violence Against Indigenous Women in Canada

The statistics on violence and poverty mentioned in the introduction support the notion that Indigenous people continue be victims of systemic and socially biased institutions that serve the political and economic agenda of the Canadian government.

Crimes against women in Indigenous communities should be understood as part of a wider scope of social turmoil caused largely by government policies that attempt to erode Indigenous culture. Going as far back as the Indian Act (1876), which continues to exist (with amendments), the federal government has control of “Indian” education, land, resources, and band administration (“Background: Indian Act”). Perhaps most regrettable is the ongoing and detrimental impact of Residential Schools on Indigenous peoples’ cultural life. The dark legacies of these policies promote a high poverty rate, poor education opportunities, and a society of high crime in Indigenous communities. Further, due to the government’s arguably ineffective efforts to amend the past, the homicide and missing persons’ rates for Indigenous women and girls is disproportionately high. Between 1980 and 2012, roughly 1017 women and girls who identify as indigenous were murdered (not including undocumented, unreported, or unexplained deaths) – a rate approximately 4.5 times higher than that of all other Canadian women. A 2013 report states that there are at least 105 Indigenous girls missing under suspicious circumstances (“Missing and Murdered”).

The cycle of poverty and crime stems from the lack of education available in Indigenous communities. Compared with the settler culture of “degrees equals job opportunity,” formal education is severely less available for on-reserve Indigenous peoples. In fact, 20% of Metis, 47% of First Nations on reserve, and 49% of Inuit populations do not have high school diplomas, while 12% of Canada’s total population does not have high school diplomas (Social Development Canada). The insufficient or non-existent provincial government funding for schools in Indigenous communities is the cause of low education availability for Indigenous peoples, and is representative of the broader social marginalization caused by the both provincial and federal governments.  In British Columbia (BC) – the only province with supplemental agreements for education funds for Indigenous populations, the per-student funding for First Nations students is approximately 20% less than those students in provincial public schools. Outside of BC, funding for Indigenous students is about 37% less than their non-Indigenous counterparts.  This severe deficit in funding results in poor infrastructure, an inability to obtain and retain quality teachers, less educational programs, and overall less opportunity for indigenous students (Moore). Now, consider this – an Indigenous person unable to achieve a high school diploma is seeking a job outside of their reserve. They enter into a world where a high school diploma is an assumed achievement, and they are regrettably unprepared at no fault of their own. Unemployment becomes their new reality, and poverty is soon to follow. Studies have shown that one’s income level is highly correlated with their probability of being a victim of crime (Social Development Canada). The high crime rates, particularly with regards to women, can be attributed to the equally high rates of poverty among Indigenous communities caused by a severe lack of educational opportunities.

The issues caused by the overarching social marginalization of Indigenous communities fosters an unhealthy culture of substance abuse and mental illness that some indigenous people struggle with (as a result of their social, political, and economic colonialism). Many indigenous families have lost a family member to suicide or addiction.  The overshadowing shame historically inflicted by the government continues to invade the lives of indigenous peoples in Canada. As one Indigenous woman said in a hearing as part of Canada’s National Inquiry into the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, “the federal government made us wards of the state through the Indian Act and we learnt helplessness. We became ashamed of ourself. We believed what society was telling us” (“Part 1: Families and Survivors”). This heartbreaking testimony is only one of many, and clearly exhibits the brutal psychological impact that society-wide shaming has had on a community. In the context of violence against Indigenous women, many abusers were victims of residential schools and similarly, a lot of victims were residential school survivors (“Part 1: Families and Survivors”). The lack of resources to cope with life after residential schools coupled with existing in the anger of their personal and ancestral pasts only further promotes a cycle of violence against women and social turmoil in Indigenous communities.

When attempting to connect settler and Indigenous histories, Indigenous history is often portrayed incorrectly. This slows the process of reconciliation. Non-indigenous Canadians are miseducated about Indigenous peoples by their teachers and parents who were taught by generations of misinformed settler Canadians. Continuation of the incorrect education of Indigenous peoples’ histories and experiences will only further entrench a division between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians. Ending the unequal treatment of Indigenous peoples and reducing the rates of missing and murdered Indigenous women in Canada will require cooperation between non-Indigenous and Indigenous Canadians, but without accurate shared information and a clear understanding of each other’s histories, this will be impossible.

The repeated violence against the culture and collective identity of Indigenous peoples has debilitated the foundation of Indigenous communities and society. The isolation and forced withdrawal of Indigenous peoples from the rest of Canadian society cultivates social problems for the individuals and the communities, which only further promote the social marginalization that increases the risk of violence faced by women.

Current Cases

There are many ongoing cases of missing and murdered Indigenous women in Canada. Below are some of the most recent known cases, keeping in mind that many cases go unreported. Amnesty Interntional University of Toronto mourns the loss of these women and urges capable bodies to do what they can to address this issue. We must continue to shed light on the issue of murdered and missing indigenous women by engaging in conversations, supporting organizations that do necessary work, lobbying the government to take adequate steps, and refusing to be silenced. May these women rest in power. The impact they had on their communities is far greater than the hate that took their lives.

Chantel John – Conne River, Newfoundland: Chantel, murdered at age 28, was a member of the Miawpukek Mi’kamawey Mawi’omi First Nation. Her ex-boyfriend Kirk Keeping was arrested by RCMP, accused of first degree murder. The Miawpukek Mi’kamawey Mawi’omi First Nation stated that Chantel’s case is representative of Canada’s national crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous women (“Man Charged”).

Ashley Morin – North Battleford, Sakatchewan: 31 year-old Ashley Morin was reported missing on January 11, 2019 – she was last seen on July 10, 2018. Her family hung red dresses on trees around the city, symbolizing missing and murdered Indigenous women (“Vigil to Be Held”).Erica Hill O’Watch – Regina, Saskatchewan:

Erica Hill O’Watch – Regine, Saskatchewan: ‘Erica was pronounced dead at the scene of a house party on October 13, 2018.  The 16 year old’s friends and family are now honouring Hill-O’Watch with a Missing and Murdered Indigenous Logo. A 15 year-old boy was was arrested and charged with second-degree murder (“I Don’t Get to See Her Fall in Love”). Dianne Mae Bignell – Thomson, Manitoba:

Dianne Mae Bignell – Thomson, Manitoba: 60 year-old Dianne was last seen on her birthday on May 17, 2018. The RCMP have assured her daughter Clara Bignell that they are actively working on finding her mother (“Missing and Murdered Aboriginal Women”).

Jeanenne Chantel Fontaine – Winnipeg, Manitoba: 29 year-old Jeanenne was shot dead in March 2017. On January 19, 2019, a jury found Christopher Brass and Jason Meilleur to be guilty of manslaughter. Jeanenne’s father, Eugene Fontaine was found beaten to death in 2011. Jeanenne’s cousin, 15 year old Tina Fontaine, was found dead in Red River in August of 2014. Jeanenne’s case is representative of how it is common for Indigenous families to experience the loss of  several family members to targeted violence (Malone).

Monica Jack – Vancouver, British Columbia: Monica was sexually assaulted and strangled to death when she was 12 years old in 1978. Her skull and bones were found 17 years later. On January 17, 2019, Garry Handlen was charged for the first-degree murder of Monica. Handlen was involved in a supposed gang organization. He told his crime boss that he grabbed and “Indigenous girl,” threw her bike in a lake, forced her into the bathroom of his camper and drove up a rough hill where he killed her (Bains).

Cassidy Bernard – Cape Breton, Nova Scotia: 22 year-old Cassidy was found unresponsive in her home in the We’koqma’q First Nation on October 24, 2018. A $100,000 reward has been offered by the We’koqma’q band council for information that leads to an arrest and conviction in connection with Cassidy’s death. The RCMP have labelled Cassidy’s death as “suspicious,” and have yet to confirm or deny the case as homicide (“Police Still Tight-Lipped”).

Cindy Gladue– Edmonton, Alberta: In June 2011, Cindy, a 36-year old Metis woman, bled to death in a bathtub in a motel room. Cindy was described to have suffered from drug addiction and poverty. Bradley Barton was accused but found not guilty by a jury of manslaughter and first-degree murder. The case revealed that Barton and Gladue had “consensual” but extremely violent sex that left the victim with an 11cm cut in her vagina. Following nationwide protests, the Crown appealed, and the Alberta Court of Appeal ordered a new trial that began in October 2018. The Appeal Court ruled that there were serious errors in the original trial. The Appeal court also claims that the judge’s charge to the jury about Barton’s conduct, as well as how consent is defined and understood as it pertains to sexual assault legislation. The Alberta Crown will argue to the Supreme Court to set precedent for if an “objective likelihood of harm” cancels out sexual consent. Similarly to how someone killed in a fist fight didn’t consent to bodily harm (Purdy).

Mary Yellowback – Winnipeg, Manitoba: The 33 year-old mother of six was found dead in a recycling depot. She lived on Manto Sipi Cree Nation in northern Manitoba and was visiting Winnipeg for a medical appointment for her son. Her death has been ruled as “suspicious,” however police have yet to confirm if her death was a homicide. News of Mary’s death spread as the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls held hearings in Winnipeg. The homicide unit in Winnipeg is continuing to investigate Mary’s death (“‘It’s Tragic’”).

What is currently being done?

Addressing indigenous peoples’ and indigenous and non-indigenous activists’ demands, the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women began in 2016.  This entity promises to included affected families in the process while respecting the traumatic nature of these issues as well as respecting diversity. It seeks to conclude by proposing concrete steps to prevent more women from undergoing this violence. Thus the intentions were to work coast to coast, which is a major divergence from the previous practice of understanding and deciding on issues related to indigenous wellbeing from Ottawa. While the entity was composed of four Commissioners from across the country, one quit, and while the commission was supposed to submit its report by December 31st 2018, it was granted an extension of five months, which raises several questions. Was the budget of $53 million insufficient? Was the breadth and depth of task underestimated?  The slow pace of the commission raised concerns in indigenous communities over what can be perceived as a lack of interest or partial engagement, which is not contributive to the government’s supposed attempts towards reconciliation.

The Native Women’s Association of Canada also pursued outreach programs through artistic workshops. For example, the artist Gloria Larocque, creator of the “Aboriginal Angel Doll Project” was asked to explore the visual representation of strong and beautiful indigenous women who have become ‘faceless’ victims of crime to give back these women their story and some agency, so they live in the memory of not only their families but also other Canadians. Larocque created a traveling art exhibit of more than 600 Faceless Dolls. This idea was well received and seemed to respond to some concrete demands of restoring dignity to women who were subject to this violence. Families, community members, teachers, and allies continue to reach out to the NWAC to replicate the concept of the exhibition.

Non-governmental actors have also been involved in advancing this issue. Most notably, Sisters In Spirit (SIS) distinguished itself because it was driven and led by indigenous women. Similar to the NWAC, it sought to produce knowledge and disseminate it, first by filling the gap on statistical information on violence against indigenous women. As a matter of fact, only Manitoba could provide the public with information similar to the information produced by Sisters in Spirit. The database is extraordinaily complex as it takes 200 variables into account, and it remains active. Thus, it allows for complex analysis of patterns as well as visualizations of it. SIS also did considerable work in preserving the memory of those who were lost to this violence.

Moving Forward

Amnesty International has pointed out that the perspective in which the Canadian government is framing this issue detracts from the push towards more effective action . In effect, refusing to apply the category of “torture” to such a crisis because it is perpetrated by non-state actors is to miss the point. It is a very narrow understanding of the UN definition of torture, one that applies to a past where states were the main actors for torture, at least in its historical documentation.

While we appreciate the National Commission’s effort to produce the best report, the demand for an extension proved that Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, and Indigenous communities were right in their complaint that the process was slow. Further, the announcement of a deadline extension came to many as a surprise. If the National Commission wants to operate on less of a top-down approach, it ought to improve its communication strategy by involving key actors to corroborate with the government’s announced intention to move towards reconciliation.  Amnesty International has long asked for a National Action Plan, addressing gaps in policy, specially in prevention and in dealing with new cases promptly.

References

“Background: The Indian Act | CBC News.” CBCnews, CBC/Radio Canada, 14 July 2011, www.cbc.ca/news/canada/background-the-indian-act-1.1056988.

Bains, Camille. “Jury Finds Man Accused of Killing B.C. Girl Guilty.” CTVNews, 18 Jan. 2019, www.ctvnews.ca/canada/jury-finds-man-accused-of-killing-b-c-girl-guilty-1.4258248.

“Half of First Nations Children Live in Poverty | CBC News.” CBCnews, CBC/Radio Canada, 19 June 2013, www.cbc.ca/news/canada/half-of-first-nations-children-live-in-poverty-1.1324232.

“’I Don’t Get to See Her Fall in Love’: Mother Mourns Teen Killed at House Party.” CTV News Regina, 10 Jan. 2019, regina.ctvnews.ca/i-don-t-get-to-see-her-fall-in-love-mother-mourns-teen-killed-at-house-party-1.4246924.

“’It’s Tragic’: Father of Woman Found Dead in Winnipeg Recycling Depot Pleads for Information.” Winnipeg, 3 Oct. 2018, winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/it-s-tragic-father-of-woman-found-dead-in-winnipeg-recycling-depot-pleads-for-information-1.4118825.

Malone, Kelly Geraldine. “’She Was Loved’: Man Gets 15-Year Sentence in Shooting Death of Jeanenne Fontaine.” CTVNews, 24 Jan. 2019, www.ctvnews.ca/canada/she-was-loved-man-gets-15-year-sentence-in-shooting-death-of-jeanenne-fontaine-1.4266824.

“Man Charged with First-Degree Murder of Newfoundland Indigenous Woman.” CTVNews, 11 Jan. 2019, www.ctvnews.ca/canada/man-charged-with-first-degree-murder-of-newfoundland-indigenous-woman-1.4249521.

“Missing and Murdered Aboriginal Women.” CBCnews, CBC/Radio Canada, www.cbc.ca/missingandmurdered/.

“Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls: Understanding the Numbers.” Amnesty International Canada, 11 Oct. 2017, www.amnesty.ca/blog/missing-and-murdered-indigenous-women-and-girls-understanding-the-numbers.

Moore, Dene. “Native School Conditions in Canada Are Shocking: Panel Chair.” The Globe and Mail, Special to The Globe and Mail, 3 May 2018, beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/native-school-conditions-in-canada-are-shocking-panel-chair/article557527/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&.

Part 1 Hearings: Families and Survivors. National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. 30 May, 2017.

Pederson, Anne Marie, and Tabitha Marshall. “Indigenous Women’s Issues in Canada.” The Canadian Encyclopedia, 7 Feb. 2006, www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/native-womens-issues.

“Police Still Tight-Lipped about Death of Young Mi’kmaw Woman | CBC News.” CBCnews, CBC/Radio Canada, 15 Nov. 2018, www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/cassidy-bernard-police-tight-lipped-1.4907506.

Purdy, Chris. “Supreme Court to Hear Questions in Case of Woman’s Death after Rough Sex.” Edmonton, 9 Oct. 2018, edmonton.ctvnews.ca/supreme-court-to-hear-questions-in-case-of-woman-s-death-after-rough-sex-1.4126464.

Social Development Canada. “Towards a Poverty Reduction Strategy – A Backgrounder on Poverty in Canada.” Canada.ca, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, 27 Feb. 2017, www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/poverty-reduction/backgrounder.html#h2.7-h3.4.

“Vigil to Be Held for Ashley Morin.” Saskatoon, 11 Jan. 2019, saskatoon.ctvnews.ca/vigil-to-be-held-for-ashley-morin-1.4249933.

Labour Rights and the 2022 Qatar FIFA World Cup

By Sarah Taupan. Image from sportsnet.ca

Gulf countries such as the UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia have become the primary destination region for foreign workers globally, and the numbers have been steadily increasing in recent years. The proportion of foreign to local workers in these areas are amongst the highest in the world. Many of these workers are manual labourers or domestic workers and suffer from exploitation and severe human rights violations. Transnational labour migration has become one of the most remarkable features of our globalizing world, with a network of over 214 million workers having crossed national borders to date. Migration within the Gulf states alone constitutes 10% of that and Saudi Arabia and the UAE host the 4th and 5th largest migrant populace in the world. Coming from mainly Asia and Africa, these workers seek opportunities in these regions to escape poverty and unemployment only to be met with hefty fees from recruitment agencies, long working hours, inadequate pay, and no time off from jobs that often differ vastly from the ones they signed up for back home. Many are caught in slave-like conditions, where they are unpaid and unable to leave their jobs. The UN estimates that 600,000 migrant workers in the region can be characterized as victims of human trafficking.

Furthermore, migrants are often unable to leave the country of residence as their employers hold back their paperwork. In most of these cases the employers will seize the workers’ passports upon arrival. There have been various reports of abuse, frozen wages, and excessive workloads. There are also documented incidents of psychological, physical and sexual violence. The visa sponsorship system (kafala), as well as the lack of labour laws, leaves foreign workers vulnerable to abuse. The kafala system binds migrant worker to an employer, who acts as their sponsor, this makes it difficult for them to leave or change jobs. If the worker tries to leave their sponsor before their contract ends, they will be considered to have “abandoned” their job. This usually results in disciplinary actions such as fines and deportation.

In December 2010, Qatar celebrated its bid to host the 2022 FIFA World Cup. In their groundwork, Qatar is set to spend an estimated $100 billion USD on infrastructure, which includes eight new hotels and stadiums, a new airport, and a transportation system for fans. As a result, human rights organizations have expressed concern over abuses of migrant workers’ rights in Qatar. According to the International Trade Union Confederation, over 1,200 migrant workers have died so far while working on projects relating to the upcoming World Cup. The government has claimed to have improved working conditions for foreigners recently, and have allowed migrant workers to travel without their employers’ consent in September. However, these reforms are generally insufficient and lack stringent enforcement. Investigations have found that laws protecting workers from operating during the hottest hours of the day have often not been imposed. Additionally, they have found that employers continue to seize the passports of their staff, despite new reforms.

The reality of migrant lives is illustrated in a report by Amnesty International, which found that a recruitment company had been leaving workers unpaid for months. The workers they spoke to said that they paid amounts ranging from US$500 to US$4,300 to fraudulent agencies in their home country, leaving many in debt. This makes them scared to leave their jobs when they arrive in Qatar, and many are prohibited from leaving work sites altogether. The agents also promise fake salaries to workers, one migrant worker said he was promised a salary of US$300 back home in Nepal, but once he started work in Qatar, that number quickly dropped to $190US. When workers complain about their conditions, seek help, or demand promised wages, they are either ignored or threatened by their sponsors. Migrants who refuse to work can be delivered to the police for deportation, without receiving the pay they are owed. Some Nepalese workers that were interviewed have taken their children out of school or have had to sell land, in order to pay the debts they incurred for their migration to Qatar.

Many have called for the boycott of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar due to its slave-like labour conditions. Major concerns surrounding preparation for the games include the exploitative “kafala” sponsorship system; Amnesty International has called on Qatar to completely abolish the sponsorship system. Despite a few recent changes, the program continues to cause the lack of freedom of association, the right to form unions as well as the confiscation of passports; and hazardous working and living conditions. The program means that they can’t change jobs, they can’t leave the country and they often wait months to get paid, if they are paid at all. Meanwhile, FIFA, its sponsors, and the development companies involved are set to make massive financial gains from the tournament.

Works Cited:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2016/03/qatar-world-cup-of-shame/

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/02/qatarauthorities-must-step-up-efforts-to-honour-labour-rights-promises-before-2022-world-cup/

https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/27/football/qatar-2022-world-cup-workers-heat-humidity-human-rights-watch/index.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/25/revealed-qatars-world-cup-slaves

Exploring the Ethics of Plant-Based Lifestyles

Continue reading

Rethinking Recycling

Continue reading